NGE · Investment Letter · Issue 36 · June 2026

The De-Dollarization
Reality.

Russia and China now settle roughly 90% of their bilateral trade outside the dollar. Central banks bought over 1,000 tonnes of gold for three consecutive years. Yet the dollar still underpins 56-59% of global reserves and roughly 58% of international payments. What's actually being built is a parallel financial infrastructure for a specific set of nations — not a dollar replacement.

Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Research and long-horizon thinking only. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decision. Figures cited are sourced from the IMF COFER database, the World Gold Council, the Atlantic Council, and BRICS official documentation, current as of writing.

What's Actually Verifiable

The dollar's reserve share
is declining, gradually.

The most reliable data point in this entire thesis comes from the IMF's COFER database, which tracks central bank currency reserve composition globally and is updated quarterly with minimal political spin: the dollar's share of global foreign exchange reserves stood at 57.8% in Q4 2024, down from a peak of 72% in 2001 — a genuine, multi-decade decline, but a gradual one averaging roughly half a percentage point annually, not a collapse. Separately, the Atlantic Council places the dollar's share of currency exchanges at approximately 89% and its share of foreign reserves at 56% as of late 2025, broadly consistent with the COFER figures within normal measurement variance between sources.

The euro, not gold or any BRICS-issued asset, has emerged as the primary beneficiary of this specific decline according to the Q2 2025 COFER release — an important and frequently overlooked detail, since most popular coverage of de-dollarization frames it as a dollar-versus-BRICS-alternatives story when the actual reserve flow data shows the second-largest reserve currency capturing most of the share the dollar has shed.

"I don't think there's any policy on our part to replace the dollar... I don't think there's a unified BRICS position on this." — S. Jaishankar, India's External Affairs Minister, March 2025

72% → 58%
Dollar's global reserve share, 2001 to late 2024
90%
Russia-China bilateral trade settled outside the dollar
1,000+
Tonnes of central bank gold purchases, each of the last 3 years
The Infrastructure Being Built

Real systems,
operating at meaningful but bounded scale.

This is not aspirational rhetoric — the operational infrastructure genuinely exists and is processing real transaction volume. The mBridge system enables instant central bank payments between China, Hong Kong, Thailand, and the UAE using digital national currencies, bypassing dollar intermediation entirely for those specific corridors. BRICS Pay functions as a decentralized payment-card system allowing consumer transactions in local currencies across member states, engineered to connect existing national systems — Russia's SPFS, China's CIPS, India's UPI — rather than building an entirely new single system from nothing. The New Development Bank has set an explicit target of 30% local-currency lending by 2026, a real, trackable institutional commitment, not a vague aspiration.

The Dollar System · Still Dominant
  • 56-59% of global FX reserves
  • ~58% of international payments
  • 89% of currency conversion exchanges
  • $315 trillion in global debt, 64% dollar-denominated
The Parallel System · Real but Bounded
  • 90% of Russia-China bilateral trade, non-dollar
  • mBridge: 4 central banks, operational, instant settlement
  • NDB target: 30% local-currency lending by 2026
  • BRICS+ combined GDP: ~35% global PPP-weighted
$39T
US national debt, the structural pressure driving the de-dollarization motivation
10
Full BRICS+ member nations as of early 2026
40+
Central banks with active yuan swap lines via China
Why "Replacement" Is the Wrong Frame

The official BRICS position
is more cautious than the headlines.

📜 Official Documents Are Measured

BRICS's own institutional documentation does not present de-dollarization as a sudden rupture with the international monetary system — it frames the effort as financial resilience and reduced exchange-rate exposure, explicitly distinct from claims about imminent dollar replacement as the dominant reserve currency.

🇮🇳 India's Explicit Caution

India, BRICS's 2026 chair, has repeatedly distanced itself from any dollar-replacement framing, and on February 2, 2026 signed a US trade deal agreeing to halt Russian oil purchases in exchange for reduced tariffs — a direct illustration that even within BRICS, individual members' interests diverge sharply on this issue.

🪙 Gold, Not a BRICS Currency

Despite years of discussion about a gold-backed BRICS "Unit" currency, even Putin has explicitly walked back single-currency ambitions, stating plainly in November 2024 that BRICS has "not sought to abandon the dollar." The pilot Unit launched October 2025 remains a small-scale 100-unit test, not an operational reserve asset.

⚠️ Tariff Deterrence Is Real

President Trump's explicit threat of 100% tariffs on BRICS nations attempting to replace the dollar functions as a genuine policy deterrent shaping how aggressively any individual member is willing to push de-dollarization rhetoric into actual reserve-asset reallocation.

The Gold Signal Is the Cleanest Data Point
Central bank gold purchasing — 1,045 tonnes in 2024, the third consecutive year above 1,000 tonnes, more than double the 473-tonne 2010-2021 average, with 2025 estimated near 863 tonnes and 2026 projected at 755 tonnes — is the single most reliable, depoliticized signal in this entire thesis. Gold purchases reflect genuine central bank risk management decisions made independently of any single country's political rhetoric, and the sustained multi-year elevation above historical norms is hard evidence of declining confidence in dollar-centric reserve concentration, regardless of how the broader BRICS narrative evolves.
The Weaponization Feedback Loop
The motivation for this entire trend traces directly to a specific, identifiable event: the freezing of roughly $300 billion in Russian central bank reserves following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, which sent an unambiguous signal to non-aligned nations that dollar-system reliance creates existential vulnerability to US and allied sanctions. This creates a feedback risk worth naming directly — further dollar weaponization in response to future conflicts would likely accelerate parallel-system adoption among nations seeking insulation, even if none of them currently intend full dollar replacement.
The Honest Read

The most breathless "de-dollarization" coverage — predicting imminent dollar collapse, BRICS currency launches, or a sudden multipolar reserve order — is not supported by the official documentation or the most reliable data sources. CADTM's detailed review of actual BRICS summit declarations found no serious concrete progress toward a common currency even discussed at the most recent Rio summit, and Putin himself has explicitly abandoned single-currency ambitions. The gap between sensationalized headline coverage and the cautious, gradualist official position is wide, and investors should weight the latter far more heavily.

That said, dismissing this trend entirely because the most extreme version hasn't materialized would also be a mistake — the gradual, bounded version is real, measurable, and accelerating in specific corridors. A 90% non-dollar settlement rate between Russia and China, a functioning four-central-bank instant settlement system, and three consecutive years of historically elevated central bank gold buying are not symbolic gestures. They represent genuine infrastructure-building that reduces — without eliminating — dollar dependency for a defined set of nations with specific sanctions-exposure or strategic-autonomy motivations.

The NGE View

The verdict.

What We Believe
"Parallel systems, not replacement" is the accurate framing, and the official BRICS documentation supports it more strongly than most market commentary acknowledges. The dollar's continued 56-59% reserve share and ~58% payment dominance, even after years of active de-dollarization rhetoric, is itself the strongest evidence against an imminent-replacement thesis.
Central bank gold accumulation is the cleanest, least politically contaminated signal to track going forward. Three consecutive years above 1,000 tonnes, more than double the prior decade's average, reflects genuine and depoliticized risk-management behavior rather than rhetorical positioning, making it the most credible leading indicator in this entire thesis.
The euro, not gold or any BRICS currency, is the actual primary beneficiary of the dollar's gradual reserve-share decline. This is the single most underreported fact in popular de-dollarization coverage, and should reshape how investors think about which assets actually benefit from this trend.
Watch the Russia-China 90% non-dollar settlement figure as the leading indicator for how far bilateral parallel systems can scale — it represents the most advanced real-world test case of full dollar bypass between two large economies, and its durability or expansion to additional bilateral pairs is the clearest forward signal available.

The de-dollarization story deserves neither the breathless urgency of its most sensational coverage nor dismissal as pure rhetoric. What the verifiable data actually shows is a gradual, multi-decade decline in dollar reserve dominance, running alongside a genuinely operational but currently bounded parallel financial infrastructure built specifically by and for nations with acute sanctions exposure or explicit strategic-autonomy goals. The dollar's position is measurably eroding at the margin while remaining structurally dominant at the core — both things are true simultaneously, and any investment thesis that collapses this into a single simple narrative in either direction is missing the actual shape of what's happening.

NGE · A Futuristic Investment Letter

Long-horizon thinking on capital, technology, and the forces shaping the next decade of wealth creation. Written from first principles. Not consensus. Not noise.

— Pawan Bhatia · NextGen Economics · Bangalore, India